TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection was warranted against coercive action pursuant to the impugned notifications pending filing of reply and further hearing.
Analysis: The petition raised a constitutional challenge to the notifications and it was noted that similar challenges had already been entertained by other High Courts with interim protection granted. The respondents did not dispute this position and sought time to file a reply. In these circumstances, the Court considered it appropriate to grant protection from coercive steps till the next hearing.
Conclusion: Interim protection against coercive action was granted in favour of the petitioner till the next date of hearing.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
