Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the quantity of ganja involved, being 600 grams, made out only an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and not under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) thereof. (ii) Whether the procedure under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies to offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Issue (i): Whether the quantity of ganja involved, being 600 grams, made out only an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and not under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) thereof.
Analysis: The quantity involved was found to be 600 grams. The quantity chart in the notification under Section 2 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 treated up to 1000 grams of ganja as small quantity and 20 kilograms as commercial quantity. On that basis, the alleged recovery fell within small quantity and did not satisfy the ingredients of commercial quantity.
Conclusion: The registration of the FIR under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) was erroneous and the case attracted only Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Issue (ii): Whether the procedure under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies to offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Analysis: Section 4(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies the procedural provisions of the Code to offences under other laws, subject to inconsistency. Section 51 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 similarly makes the Code applicable to warrants, arrests, searches and seizures where not inconsistent with the Act. Since the Act contains no express or implied exclusion of Section 41A, and the offence found was punishable with less than seven years' imprisonment, the safeguard under Section 41A was held applicable.
Conclusion: Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies to the offence in question under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Final Conclusion: The Investigating Officer was directed to follow the notice procedure under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as the case was held to involve only small quantity ganja and not the commercial quantity offence initially invoked.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the quantity involved falls within small quantity and the special statute does not expressly or impliedly exclude the general procedural safeguard, the notice mechanism under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies even to offences under the special enactment.