Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise demand recovery could be enforced against a company protected by a subsisting notification declaring it a relief undertaking.
Analysis: The notification under the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 suspended the remedy for enforcement of liabilities against the company for the protected period. As the disputed excise liabilities related to a period earlier than the notified cut-off date, recovery action by the excise authorities was covered by the statutory protection and could not be proceeded with while the notification remained in force.
Conclusion: Enforcement of the excise demands was barred during the currency of the notification, and the relief sought by the petitioners was warranted.