Electricity charges recovered from residents on actual cost basis liable to GST under Rule 33 CGST Rules 2017

AAR Uttarakhand held that electricity charges recovered from residents on actual cost basis are liable to GST as the applicant failed to qualify as pure agent under Rule 33 of CGST Rules, 2017. The services constitute a wholesome package where electricity supply is integral to maintenance services, and residents have no option to opt out. Asset Replacement Deposits collected from residents were ruled as advances toward future services, not deposits, making them liable to GST at time of collection as they constitute consideration for planned or unplanned capital outlay services.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of GST on electricity charges paid to UPCL for power consumed by residents in their residential apartments and recovered from them on an actual cost basis.
2. Applicability of GST on electricity charges paid to UPCL for power consumed towards common areas and recovered from residents on an actual cost basis.
3. Applicability of GST on Asset Replacement Deposits collected from residents.

Analysis of the Judgment:

1. GST on Electricity Charges for Residential Apartments:
The applicant, a registered Public Limited Company, provides services in a senior living community, including residential apartments and common facilities. They recover electricity charges from residents on an actual cost basis. The applicant argued that these charges should be exempt from GST as they are merely passing through the electricity costs charged by UPCL, which are exempt from GST. However, the authority found that the applicant does not meet the criteria of a "pure agent" under Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The electricity charges are bundled with other services provided by the applicant, forming a composite supply, thus making them liable to GST.

2. GST on Electricity Charges for Common Areas:
Similar to the charges for residential apartments, the applicant recovers electricity costs for common areas from residents. These charges are also argued to be exempt by the applicant. However, the authority ruled that these charges are part of the composite supply of services provided by the applicant, which includes maintenance and other facilities. As such, these charges are also liable to GST. The authority emphasized that the applicant's infrastructure and services are dependent on electricity, and thus, the electricity charges cannot be separated from the overall service package.

3. GST on Asset Replacement Deposits:
The applicant collects Asset Replacement Deposits from residents to meet future capital outlays. These deposits are non-refundable and are calculated based on the super area of the apartments. The applicant contended that these deposits are merely transactions of money and do not constitute a supply under GST law. However, the authority found that these deposits are advances for future services and thus qualify as consideration under Section 2(31) of the CGST Act, 2017. The authority ruled that these deposits are liable to GST at the time of receipt, as they are advances towards future supply of services.

Conclusion:
The authority ruled that:
1. Electricity charges paid to UPCL for power consumed by residents in their residential apartments and recovered from them on an actual cost basis are liable to GST.
2. Electricity charges paid to UPCL for power consumed towards common areas and recovered from residents on an actual cost basis are liable to GST.
3. Asset Replacement Deposits collected from residents are considered advances for future supply of services and are taxable under Section 13(2)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017.

---