Seed is not agricultural produce, so related storage and transport services are not GST-exempt; in-house processing is not a taxable supply.

Seed produced, processed, packed and sold for sowing was held not to be agricultural produce because it fell outside the limited cultivation-linked and primary-market framework for that term; accordingly, the GST exemptions for storage, job-work processing, loading, unloading and transport of agricultural produce did not apply to the related activities. The ruling also held that processing carried out by the applicant for its own in-house seed production did not amount to a supply to another person, and was therefore not taxable on that basis.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether seeds produced, processed, packed and sold for sowing qualify as agricultural produce, and whether the connected storage, job-work processing and transport services are exempt from GST. (ii) Whether in-house processing by the applicant amounts to a taxable supply.

Issue (i): Whether seeds produced, processed, packed and sold for sowing qualify as agricultural produce, and whether the connected storage, job-work processing and transport services are exempt from GST.

Analysis: The definition of agricultural produce requires produce from cultivation that is either unprocessed or processed only in the manner usually adopted by a cultivator or producer so as not to alter essential characteristics and to make it marketable in the primary market. The ruling held that seed quality goods are distinct from grain and are not meant for food, fibre, fuel or similar uses in the sense required by the notification. Applying noscitur a sociis, the expression "raw material" was read in the context of the accompanying words and not as extending to the applicant's seed business. Since the products were treated as seed and not as agricultural produce, the exemptions for cultivation-related services, support services, and transport of agricultural produce were held inapplicable to the applicant's storage, loading, unloading, packing, processing, and transportation activities.

Conclusion: Seed is not agricultural produce, and the related storage, job-work processing, and transport services are not exempt from GST.

Issue (ii): Whether in-house processing by the applicant amounts to a taxable supply.

Analysis: The ruling treated the activity of processing undertaken by the applicant for itself in the course of in-house seed production as not involving a supply to another person for GST purposes.

Conclusion: In-house processing does not involve a supply and is not taxable on that basis.

Final Conclusion: The ruling is adverse on exemption for seed-related storage, processing, and transport services, but favourable on the question whether self-performed in-house processing constitutes a taxable supply.

Ratio Decidendi: Produce qualifies as agricultural produce only when it remains within the notification's limited cultivation-linked and primary-market framework; seed quality goods used for sowing fall outside that framework, and self-performed in-house activity does not by itself create a taxable supply.

---