Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from customers represented consideration for a works contract for laying and polishing mosaic tiles, or the sale value of mosaic tiles liable to tax under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The dispute concerned assessment year 1985-86, when liability on works contract under Section 3B of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 had not yet come into force. The lower authorities found, on the basis of the record, that the assessee had not produced any agreement with customers, had not maintained the relevant stock and production records, and had not shown materials being taken to customers' sites. On those facts, they concluded that the receipts reflected sale of mosaic tiles and not execution of works contract. The issue was treated as predominantly factual, and no perversity or infirmity in the Tribunal's finding was shown.
Conclusion: The receipts were rightly held to be turnover from sale of mosaic tiles and not works contract; the levy under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the character of a transaction depends on the contract and surrounding facts, and the fact-finding authority reaches a conclusion that is neither perverse nor unsupported by the record, judicial interference is unwarranted.