Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal approves Amalgamation Scheme between Companies under Companies Act 2013</h1> <h3>Mohan Apartments Private Limited and Ors. Versus Kamal Encon Industries Limited</h3> Mohan Apartments Private Limited and Ors. Versus Kamal Encon Industries Limited - TMI Issues Involved:1. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013.2. Dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders, secured creditors, and unsecured creditors.3. Compliance with statutory directions and notifications.4. Observations and objections from statutory authorities.5. Treatment of carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation.6. Protection of employees' interests.7. Continuation of pending proceedings.8. Increase in authorized share capital.9. Allotment of shares to the existing members of the Transferor Companies.10. Payment of fees and compliance with statutory conditions.11. Dissolution of Transferor Companies without winding up.Detailed Analysis:1. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation:The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between the Petitioner Companies under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013, as all statutory compliances were met, and no objections were raised. The Scheme was appended as Annexure-19 with the company petition.2. Dispensation of Meetings:The First Motion Application sought directions to dispense with the meetings of equity shareholders, secured creditors, and unsecured creditors, which was granted based on the written consent/affidavits submitted by these stakeholders.3. Compliance with Statutory Directions and Notifications:The Petitioner Companies complied with the directions issued by the Tribunal on 12.07.2019, including making newspaper publications and serving notices to relevant statutory authorities. Compliance affidavits and original newspaper copies were submitted as evidence.4. Observations and Objections from Statutory Authorities:- Registrar of Companies (RoC)/Regional Director (RD): The RoC and RD reports indicated no adverse observations. Clause 12 of the Scheme protected employees' interests, and Clause 8.4 ensured shareholders of Transferor Companies would receive equity shares of the Transferee Company.- Official Liquidator: The report stated no pending litigation, no amounts due to the Investor Education and Protection Fund, no deposits accepted under Sections 73-76, and no pending investigations.- Income Tax Department: Raised concerns about the carry forward of losses and unabsorbed depreciation, especially regarding compliance with Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal ordered that such carry forward and set off would only be allowed upon fulfilling statutory conditions.5. Treatment of Carry Forward and Set Off of Accumulated Loss and Unabsorbed Depreciation:The Tribunal noted that the Scheme did not specifically address the treatment of carry forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. It was ordered that these would be allowed only upon fulfilling the statutory conditions of Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.6. Protection of Employees' Interests:Clause 12 of the Scheme protected the interests of the employees of the Transferor Companies, ensuring their transfer to the Transferee Company.7. Continuation of Pending Proceedings:Any pending proceedings by or against the Transferor Companies would continue against the Transferee Company.8. Increase in Authorized Share Capital:The authorized share capital of the Transferee Company would increase by vesting the authorized share capital of the Transferor Companies without further act or deed.9. Allotment of Shares to Existing Members:The Transferee Company would allot shares to the existing members of the Transferor Companies as per the Scheme.10. Payment of Fees and Compliance with Statutory Conditions:The fee paid by the Transferor Companies on their authorized capital would be set off against any fees payable by the Transferee Company. The Transferee Company was required to file revised memorandum and articles of association and make requisite payments for the enhancement of authorized capital.11. Dissolution of Transferor Companies Without Winding Up:Upon delivery of a certified copy of the order to the Registrar of Companies, the Transferor Companies would be dissolved without undergoing the process of winding up. The Registrar would consolidate the files relating to the Transferor and Transferee Companies.Additional Orders:- The Transferee Company was ordered to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 in favor of 'The Company Law Tribunal Bar Association' within four weeks.- The Petitioner Companies were required to file the Schedule of Assets of the Transferor Companies within three weeks.- All concerned regulatory authorities were directed to act on a copy of the order annexed with the Scheme.Conclusion:The Company Petition CP (CAA) No. 16/Chd/Hry/2019 was disposed of with the Tribunal sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation and issuing detailed orders to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and protection of stakeholders' interests.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found