TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT directs AO to restrict income addition to 0.50% of turnover</h1> <h3>Shri Kishorbhai P. Thummar Versus ITO, Ward-1 (2) (4) Rajkot</h3> Shri Kishorbhai P. Thummar Versus ITO, Ward-1 (2) (4) Rajkot - TMI Issues:1. Determination of income on estimate basis2. Determination of turnover and chargeable income3. Consideration of loss commission4. Determination of real income and comparables cases5. Charging of interest under various sections6. Grounds of appeal and their considerationAnalysis:1. The appeal was filed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-1, Rajkot for the Assessment Year 2007-08. The assessee challenged the determination of income on an estimate basis at 1.25% of total turnover. The ITAT noted that in a previous case, the addition was restricted to 0.50% of turnover for a similar issue. Considering this precedent, the ITAT directed the AO to restrict the addition to 0.50%, partly allowing the appeal.2. The assessee also contested the determination of turnover and chargeable income by the Income-tax Officer and CIT(A). The ITAT reviewed the facts and previous decisions, ultimately deciding to restrict the addition to 0.50% of turnover, aligning with the precedent set in the assessee's previous case.3. The consideration of loss commission by the Income-tax Officer and CIT(A) was also challenged by the assessee. The ITAT examined the submissions and directed the AO to restrict the addition to 0.50% of turnover, in line with the previous decision and the arguments presented.4. The determination of real income and the absence of citing comparable cases were raised as issues by the assessee. The ITAT, after careful consideration of the facts and legal precedents, decided to restrict the addition to 0.50% of turnover, following the approach taken in the previous case.5. The charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was contested by the assessee. The ITAT dismissed this ground of appeal as consequential in nature, without further adjudication.6. The ITAT acknowledged the general nature of the sixth ground raised by the assessee, stating that it did not require adjudication. Ultimately, the appeal was partly allowed based on the considerations and precedents discussed in the judgment.
TaxTMI 