Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal allowed for 2012-13, dismissed for 2011-12. Tribunal upholds disallowance of 50% depreciation on factory building.</h1> <h3>M/s. Sophia Automotive Private Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6 (3), Chennai 34.</h3> The appeal for assessment year 2012-13 was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to submit details for condonation of delay. The appeal for ... Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - HELD THAT:- We find that the assessment was reopened by issuing notice under section 148 of the Act on 27.03.2015 and after following due process, the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 11.03.2016, which is well within four years of time limit provided in the statute. Accordingly the ground raised by the assessee is dismissed being devoid of merits. 50% disallowance of depreciation - AO was of the opinion that the assessee was using only 50% of the balance factory building and thus, the assessee is eligible for 50% of depreciation on factory building - The entire income which accrued and was assessed was from letting out of these properties and there was no other income of the assessee except the income from letting out of these two properties. Therefore in M/S CHENNAI PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LTD [2015 (5) TMI 46 - SUPREME COURT] has held that the rental income earned by the assessee cannot be treated as “Income from the house property”. Whereas, in this case, the assessee is engaged in manufacturing of automobile components and let out 50% of its factory building on lease and earned rental income. CIT(A) has rightly held the rental income as income under the head “house property”. Having the rental income held as income under the head “house property”, the assessee is not eligible for claim of depreciation on the let out portion. We find no infirmity in the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) and thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are dismissed. Issues:1. Delay in filing appeal before the ld. CIT(A) for assessment year 2012-13.2. Reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Act for assessment year 2011-12.3. Disallowance of 50% depreciation on factory building.Issue 1: Delay in filing appeal before the ld. CIT(A) for assessment year 2012-13:The appeal was dismissed due to a delay of 44 days in filing, with the authorized person for signing Form 35 being out of the country. The ld. CIT(A) did not condone the delay as basic details were not provided. The Tribunal directed the assessee to submit complete details for condonation of delay and directed the ld. CIT(A) to consider the details and decide the case on merits.Issue 2: Reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Act for assessment year 2011-12:The assessment was reopened within the time limit provided by the statute, and the ground raised by the assessee challenging the jurisdiction for reopening was dismissed for lack of merit. The Tribunal found the reopening process to be in compliance with the law.Issue 3: Disallowance of 50% depreciation on factory building:The Assessing Officer disallowed 50% of the depreciation claim as only 50% of the factory building was used by the assessee, with the rest let out to other parties. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, stating that rental income from letting out the building should be treated as 'Income from House Property' and not under other sources. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the rental income categorized as 'Income from House Property' renders the assessee ineligible for claiming depreciation on the let-out portion of the factory building.In conclusion, the appeal for assessment year 2012-13 was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to submit details for condonation of delay. The appeal for assessment year 2011-12 challenging the reopening of assessment was dismissed. The disallowance of 50% depreciation on the factory building was upheld by the Tribunal, emphasizing that rental income categorized as 'Income from House Property' precludes the assessee from claiming depreciation on the let-out portion.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found