Escrow Accounts: Fixed Deposits Allowed Temporarily, Supreme Court Directs Maintenance The Tribunal allowed the creation of fixed deposits in nationalized banks from Escrow Accounts for six months with auto-renewal. The Supreme Court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Tribunal allowed the creation of fixed deposits in nationalized banks from Escrow Accounts for six months with auto-renewal. The Supreme Court directed the maintenance of Escrow Accounts without allowing fixed deposits, subject to NCLAT or competent authority orders. The Tribunal declined to direct fixed deposits, emphasizing the need for further consideration during fund distribution hearings. Applications for fund appropriation were closed due to pending matters, with liberty to renew. An application for modifying a previous order to file a Section 7 application was scheduled for further hearing, with the Respondent given two weeks to reply.
Issues: 1. Application for creation of fixed deposits from monies in Escrow Accounts. 2. Clarification of order regarding fixed deposits by Hon'ble Supreme Court. 3. Jurisdiction of NCLAT to issue directions on Escrow Account funds. 4. Interim distribution and appropriation of funds in Escrow Accounts. 5. Application for modification of order to file Section 7 application.
Analysis: 1. The Application (I.A. No. 2404 of 2021) sought the creation of fixed deposits from monies in the Escrow Accounts of two entities. The Tribunal, in an interim order, allowed the creation of fixed deposits in nationalized banks for a period of six months with auto-renewal clause. Canara Bank and Union Bank of India filed a reply stating that the amount in Escrow Accounts belongs to lenders and should not accrue interest as it is a debt amount directed to be deposited by the Supreme Court.
2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court rejected applications seeking clarification on the permissibility of creating fixed deposits from Escrow Account funds. The direction from the Supreme Court stated that the Escrow Account should be maintained as such, subject to orders from NCLAT or competent authority. Other applications were filed by banks seeking appropriation of funds in Escrow Accounts.
3. The Tribunal considered its jurisdiction to direct the placement of Escrow Account funds in fixed deposits in nationalized banks. While acknowledging the pendency of matters related to interim distribution and appropriation of funds, the Tribunal decided not to grant the prayer for fixed deposits. The Tribunal emphasized that the matter required further consideration during hearings on appropriation or interim distribution of funds.
4. Several parties, including banks and claimants, had filed applications for appropriation of funds in Escrow Accounts. The Tribunal decided to close certain applications and a contempt case due to the pending matters related to interim distribution and appropriation. Applicants were given liberty to renew their prayers during future considerations on fund distribution.
5. An application (I.A. No. 296 of 2022) sought modification of a previous order to allow the filing of a Section 7 application against specific respondents. The Tribunal issued notice and scheduled the application for further hearing. The Tribunal instructed the Respondent to file a reply within two weeks and set a hearing date for the application. The Tribunal also allowed adjournment requests in related proceedings.
Overall, the judgment addressed various applications related to the creation of fixed deposits from Escrow Account funds, the jurisdiction of NCLAT, and the interim distribution and appropriation of funds, ensuring a thorough analysis of each issue presented before the Tribunal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
