Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned tax, interest and penalty order was vulnerable for want of opportunity of hearing under section 75(4) and whether interim protection against coercive recovery was warranted.
Analysis: The show cause notice referred to personal hearing, but no date, time or venue was specified. Section 75(4) contemplates a hearing where a request is made or where an adverse decision is contemplated, and the provision was treated as embodying the principles of natural justice. On the face of the record, non-compliance with the hearing requirement was noticed, and the matter was directed to be answered by counter affidavit.
Outcome: No final adjudication was made on the validity of the impugned order. Interim protection was granted and coercive action pursuant to the demand was restrained till the next date.