Year-end TDS provisions and section 201 default: later deduction cures default, while unreconciled amounts need tax-payment verification.

Year-end provisions are not to be treated as a TDS default under section 201(1) where tax is later deducted and remitted on receipt of invoices, and interest under section 201(1A) cannot be sustained on that portion. The section 201 scheme is a recovery mechanism linked to a real revenue loss, while disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) operates separately as a compliance consequence and prevents repeated TDS exposure on amounts already disallowed. For provisions reversed because invoices were never received, further verification is required, including whether the recipient has already paid tax on the embedded income before interest can be levied.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee could be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether interest under section 201(1A) could be levied, in respect of year-end provisions where tax was later deducted on receipt of invoices or the provision was reversed, while the amounts had been disallowed under section 40(a)(i)/(ia).

Analysis: The provisions created at year-end were divided into amounts on which tax was later deducted and paid when invoices were received, and amounts which were reversed because invoices were never received. The statutory scheme of section 201 was treated as a recovery mechanism intended to make good a revenue loss, and the levy under section 201(1A) was linked to the existence of a real tax default. The disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) was viewed as a separate consequence designed to ensure tax compliance and to prevent the same amount from being subjected again to TDS demand where the expenditure had already been disallowed in the computation. For amounts on which tax was eventually deducted and deposited, the assessee was not to be treated as in default. For amounts where tax was not effectuated, verification was required as to whether the recipient had paid tax on the embedded income before interest could be sustained.

Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to be treated as an assessee in default to the extent tax was subsequently deducted and remitted, and the levy of interest under section 201(1A) could not be sustained on that part; the matter for the remaining amounts was directed to be verified by the Assessing Officer.

---