Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the appeal filed with a 31-day delay was within limitation in view of the COVID-19 exclusion of time; (ii) Whether the disallowance of foreign tax credit for want of Form 67 and other evidences under Rule 128 required remand for verification of the documents filed.
Issue (i): Whether the appeal filed with a 31-day delay was within limitation in view of the COVID-19 exclusion of time.
Analysis: The period from 15.03.2021 to 02.10.2021 stood excluded while computing limitation. The appeal period was therefore to be reckoned from 03.10.2021, and the appeal could not be treated as delayed.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be within limitation.
Issue (ii): Whether the disallowance of foreign tax credit for want of Form 67 and other evidences under Rule 128 required remand for verification of the documents filed.
Analysis: The disallowance was made because the required evidences under Rule 128 were not found to have been filed with the original return. Before the Tribunal, the assessee stated that all necessary details were available. In these circumstances, and in the interest of justice, the claim required fresh examination on the basis of the material on record.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication of the foreign tax credit claim in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of securing a fresh look at the foreign tax credit claim, and the matter was sent back for reconsideration after affording proper opportunity to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the relevant evidences for a foreign tax credit claim are stated to be available, the claim should be examined on merits after affording due opportunity, and limitation is to be computed after applying the binding exclusion of the COVID-19 period.