Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of entry tax collected on purchase of aluminium ingots in view of the exemption under the entry tax framework and the undertaking furnished under the departmental circular.
Analysis: The petitioner's assertion that its industrial unit was situated in a grampanchayat area and therefore fell within the exemption under Rule 3(4) of the Orissa Entry Tax Rules, 1999 remained uncontroverted by the State. The materials also showed that the petitioner had furnished the prescribed undertaking pursuant to the departmental circular, and NALCO accepted that undertaking and deposited the collected tax with the State. In these circumstances, the collection of entry tax from the petitioner was treated as not sustainable, and the proper course was refund by the State Government together with statutory interest. The order further provided for additional simple interest if refund was delayed beyond the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to refund of the entry tax collected, along with interest in accordance with the Act and Rules, and additional simple interest for any delay beyond the period fixed in the order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory exemption conditions are satisfied and the levy collected from the purchasing dealer is not disputed on the record, the amount collected as entry tax is refundable by the State with applicable interest.