ITAT allows appeal to set off losses under Section 115BBE, aligning with CBDT Circular

The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). The ITAT held that business losses and brought forward losses can be set off against the income assessed under Section 115BBE of the Act, aligning with the CBDT Circular and relevant case laws. The decision was based on legal sustainability and jurisdictional aspects, reflecting the legislative intent behind the amendments and consistent tribunal interpretations.

---

---

Issues:
- Disallowance of set off of losses claimed by the appellant
- Failure to follow judgments of various High Courts in favor of the appellant
- Legality of disallowing set off of losses against undisclosed income

Analysis:
1. The appellant, an individual, declared total income of Rs. 93,97,830/- for the Asstt. Year 2011-12. Following a search & seizure action, the appellant voluntarily offered Rs. 50,00,000/- for taxation, reported as income from other sources. The Assessing Officer re-opened proceedings to disallow set off losses claimed by the appellant against the disclosed income. The AO disallowed the set-off of business losses and carried forward losses against the undisclosed income, considering it as 'headless income.'

2. The appellant appealed to the ld. CIT(A), who upheld the AO's decision, citing the Kerala High Court judgment in Kerala Sponge Iron Ltd case. However, various High Courts have allowed set off losses, creating a conflict. The CBDT Circular No. 11/2019 clarified that for years up to A.Y. 2016-17, income under Section 115BBE can be used to set off losses. The Kolkata Tribunal also supported this view in multiple cases, emphasizing the legislative intent behind amendments.

3. The ITAT, considering judicial precedents and the CBDT Circular, held that the business losses and brought forward losses can be set off against the income assessed under Section 115BBE of the Act. Relying on the CBDT Circular and consistent tribunal decisions, the ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). The ITAT's decision was based on legal sustainability and jurisdictional aspects, aligning with the CBDT Circular and relevant case laws.

4. Ultimately, the ITAT's decision to allow the appeal was based on the legislative intent behind the relevant amendments and the consistent interpretation provided by the CBDT Circular and tribunal decisions. The ITAT's order to delete the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) was in line with the CBDT Circular No. 11/2019 and supported by various tribunal and High Court judgments, ensuring the correct application of set off provisions against the assessed income under Section 115BBE of the Act.

---