TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of firm on Service Tax valuation, rejects arbitrary Department method.</h1> <h3>M/s. Kingmakers IAS Academy and Smt. Sathyashree Boominathan, Proprietrix Versus Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise Chennai North Commissionerate</h3> M/s. Kingmakers IAS Academy and Smt. Sathyashree Boominathan, Proprietrix Versus Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise Chennai North Commissionerate - ... Issues Involved:1. Determination of correct assessable value for Service Tax.2. Admissibility of deductions claimed towards reimbursement of expenses on account of Hostel & Mess Fee and books.3. Allegation of willful suppression of facts and imposition of penalties.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Determination of Correct Assessable Value for Service Tax:The Appellant firm is registered under 'Commercial Coaching Service' and charges tuition fees, hostel & mess fees, and book fees. The Department based its demand on the highest figures from IT Returns, invoices, bank statements, and CPU records, which was deemed arbitrary and unsustainable. The Appellant argued that the CPU data was fraudulently maintained by a previous accountant, against whom an FIR was filed. The Department failed to verify this and relied solely on the CPU data. The Tribunal found this method of computation arbitrary and lacking legal basis, emphasizing that the Department did not consider the already paid Service Tax of Rs. 3,01,994/- in its calculations, which showed bias and carelessness.2. Admissibility of Deductions for Hostel & Mess Fee and Books:The Appellant contended that the amounts collected for books and hostel & mess were optional and not directly related to taxable services. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the expenses for books were covered under Notification No. 12/2003-ST, which exempts such expenses from Service Tax. The Tribunal also found that the amounts collected for hostel and mess were paid to vendors on behalf of the students and were optional, making them non-taxable. The Tribunal relied on several case laws, including judgments from CESTAT Bangalore and Allahabad, which supported the exclusion of such charges from taxable services.3. Allegation of Willful Suppression of Facts and Imposition of Penalties:The Appellant argued that there was no willful suppression of facts and that the statements obtained from the Proprietor were under duress and were immediately retracted. The Tribunal found no mala fide intent on the part of the Appellant and noted that the Department did not distinguish the case laws cited by the Appellant. The Tribunal held that the reliance on unauthenticated CPU data was wrong and that the principles of natural justice were disregarded. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds for imposing penalties on the Appellant firm or the Proprietor.Conclusion:The Tribunal modified the demand against the Appellant firm, recognizing the incorrect and arbitrary computation by the Department. The major portion of the demand based on CPU data was found unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Appellant firm partially, with consequential relief, and fully allowed the appeal of the Proprietor, setting aside the penalties imposed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
