TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court quashes assessment order, directs review by Dispute Resolution Panel.</h1> <h3>TT STEEL SERVICE INDIA PVT LTD Versus THE ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY ASSISTANT/COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS -ASSESSMENT CENTRE, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7 (1) (1), THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL (DRP)</h3> TT STEEL SERVICE INDIA PVT LTD Versus THE ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY ASSISTANT/COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ... Issues:Quashing of final assessment order, demand notice, and other reliefs sought by the petitioner.Analysis:The petitioner sought the quashing of the final assessment order, demand notice, and related notices. The petitioner had the option to file objections after receiving the draft Assessment Order, which was duly exercised by submitting objections to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) within the prescribed period. Despite the petitioner's timely submission of objections and communication with the Assessing Officer regarding the same, the Assessment Order was passed without awaiting directions from the DRP. The petitioner argued that due to the shift to the faceless scheme and the Covid-19 pandemic, any omission in filing objections should be condoned. The petitioner contended that the Assessment Order was in violation of the mandatory provisions of Section 144C of the Income Tax Act.The respondent, on the other hand, argued that there was no merit in the petition and it should be dismissed. However, the court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It was observed that the petitioner had submitted objections within the prescribed period and had intimated the Assessing Officer accordingly. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation for any delay in filing objections, considering the extenuating circumstances and legal extensions of limitation periods. The court held that the Assessment Order passed without waiting for DRP directions was arbitrary, illegal, and lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, the court decided to quash the Assessment Order and issued directions to the DRP and the Assessing Officer to proceed in accordance with the law.In the final order, the court allowed the petition, quashed the final assessment order, demand notice, and related notices. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) was directed to conclude the proceedings by considering the objections filed by the petitioner as per Section 144C of the Income Tax Act. Once the DRP concluded the proceedings, the Assessing Officer was instructed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
