Court allows writ petitions, orders fresh testing, releases goods on bond, sets aside Seizure Memo.

The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to draw fresh samples for testing by a Government Laboratory or FSSAI and to release the goods upon submission of a P.D. bond by the petitioner. The court set aside the impugned Seizure Memo, subject to final assessment based on the fresh test report, and kept all other contentions open for future consideration.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the Provisional Release Order dated 22nd October 2021.
2. Validity of the Seizure Memo dated 3rd August 2021 and the DYCC JNCH Laboratory Test Reports.
3. Classification of imported goods under Chapter 21 of the Customs Tariff Act.
4. Authority of the Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (Import) under Section 110 of the Customs Act.
5. Binding nature of the Authority for Advance Rulings' decision dated 31st March 2017.
6. Release of goods on execution and furnishing of a Provisional Duty Bond.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Provisional Release Order dated 22nd October 2021:

The petitioner challenged the Provisional Release Order dated 22nd October 2021, seeking its quashing and setting aside. The court noted that the respondents had issued the order during the pendency of the writ petition and that the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for the assessment and clearance of goods on payment of applicable duty under Chapter 21.

2. Validity of the Seizure Memo dated 3rd August 2021 and the DYCC JNCH Laboratory Test Reports:

The petitioner contested the Seizure Memo dated 3rd August 2021, arguing that the goods covered under Chapter 21 could not be analyzed/tested at DYCC, JNCH Laboratory due to non-availability of facilities, as per Public Notices dated 23rd October 2019 and 16th June 2021. The court observed that both parties agreed that DYCC could not have tested the goods, and the seizure based on DYCC's report was thus untenable and contrary to the Public Notices.

3. Classification of imported goods under Chapter 21 of the Customs Tariff Act:

The petitioner argued that the imported goods, including various processed betel nut products, were classified under Chapter Head 21069030, as confirmed by the Authority for Advance Ruling on 31st March 2017. The respondents, however, contended that the process relating to the imported goods in question differed from the process declared in the Advance Ruling.

4. Authority of the Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (Import) under Section 110 of the Customs Act:

The petitioner sought a declaration that the officers of the Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (Import) were not 'proper officers' for the purpose of Section 110 of the Customs Act. The court did not explicitly address this issue but focused on the procedural aspects and the validity of the seizure and testing process.

5. Binding nature of the Authority for Advance Rulings' decision dated 31st March 2017:

The petitioner emphasized that the Advance Ruling dated 31st March 2017 was binding on the respondents, as it had attained finality without any appeal. The court acknowledged the petitioner's reliance on this ruling and noted that the Madras High Court had previously quashed a similar seizure memo based on the same Advance Ruling.

6. Release of goods on execution and furnishing of a Provisional Duty Bond:

The court directed the respondents to release the goods upon the petitioner submitting a P.D. bond, acknowledging that the earlier samples tested by DYCC could not have been validly tested. The release was made subject to the testing report to be submitted by a Government Laboratory or FSSAI and to the final assessment.

Conclusion:

The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to draw fresh samples for testing by a Government Laboratory or FSSAI and to release the goods upon submission of a P.D. bond by the petitioner. The court set aside the impugned Seizure Memo, subject to final assessment based on the fresh test report, and kept all other contentions open for future consideration.

---