Reopening beyond four years on same material fails absent full and true disclosure of material facts

A reassessment notice issued beyond four years from the end of the assessment year was held unsustainable where the recorded reasons relied on material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) and disclosed only a change of opinion. The first proviso to Section 147 applied, so the Revenue had to show failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. As the reasons did not disclose any such failure, reopening lacked jurisdiction and the order rejecting objections to reopening also failed. The notice and rejection order were quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a notice for reassessment issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, could be sustained where the recorded reasons reflected a change of opinion and did not disclose any failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose material facts; whether the order rejecting objections to reopening was valid.

Analysis: The assessment had already been completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, after the assessee had furnished the return, audit report, supporting documents, and explanations during scrutiny. The recorded reasons for reopening proceeded on the same material already examined in the original assessment and, on their own showing, amounted to a change of opinion. Since the notice was issued after four years, the first proviso to Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied, and the burden lay on the Revenue to show failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. No such failure could be culled from the recorded reasons, and the reopening could not be justified by disregarding the earlier assessment or by treating the disclosed facts as insufficient.

Conclusion: The reassessment notice and the order rejecting objections were unsustainable and were quashed.

Final Conclusion: Reopening of a completed scrutiny assessment after four years cannot be sustained on the same material in the absence of a disclosed failure to make full and true disclosure of material facts.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a scrutiny assessment has been completed and the reassessment notice is issued beyond four years, reopening is barred unless the recorded reasons themselves disclose the assessee's failure to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment; a mere change of opinion is not a valid basis for jurisdiction.

---