Quashing of Unexplained Income Assessment Order with Deposit Condition

The impugned order assessing unexplained income in the petitioner's account was quashed with a condition to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe. Failure to comply would render the order valid. Upon deposit, the attachment order would be lifted, and a fresh order would be issued. The quashed order was treated as a Show Cause Notice, requiring a reply within thirty days and cooperation in reassessment proceedings. The petitioner was directed to upload information and the case was disposed of without costs.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment of unexplained income in petitioner's account, failure to respond to notices, impugned order quashed subject to deposit conditions, attachment order to be vacated upon deposit, time frame for passing fresh order, impugned order treated as Show Cause Notice, deadline for filing reply, instructions for uploading information, cooperation in reassessment proceedings.

Analysis:
The judgment addresses the issue of the assessment of unexplained income in the petitioner's account. The petitioner, an IATA agent, received advance amounts from clients for airline tickets. The impugned order considered this amount as unexplained income, leading to proceedings for finalizing the assessment. The petitioner's officers, who handled accounts and tax matters, had left the company, resulting in non-responsiveness to notices from the Income Tax Department.

Regarding the failure to respond to notices, the Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents highlighted the petitioner's negligence in not addressing the notices and information requests, leading to unanswered communications. The counsel argued that certain disputed facts could not be examined in summary proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, suggesting that the petitioner should pursue an appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act.

The impugned order was quashed with the condition that the petitioner must deposit Rs. 5 Crores in two equal instalments within two months. Failure to make these payments would result in the impugned order remaining valid. Upon deposit, the attachment order issued would be automatically vacated, and a fresh order on merits would be passed within ninety days.

The judgment treated the quashed impugned order as a Show Cause Notice, requiring the petitioner to file a reply within thirty days. Instructions were given for uploading information within the specified period, and the petitioner was directed to cooperate in the reassessment proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of with these directives, without imposing any costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed accordingly.

---