Bail in bogus input tax credit prosecution granted where investigation was complete and flight risk was low.

Bail in a CGST prosecution alleging wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit through fake invoices was granted after the Court applied settled bail principles, including the nature of the accusation, severity of punishment, risk of absconding, and possibility of tampering with evidence. Although a prima facie case of bogus input tax credit transactions was noted, the Court found that investigation was substantially complete, the final report had been filed, relevant documents had been collected, and the accused was a local resident with a low flight risk. The length of custody and the unlikelihood of an early trial conclusion also weighed in favour of release, subject to stringent conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether bail should be granted to an accused in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 alleging wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit through fake invoices and fictitious transactions.

Analysis: The Court reiterated that bail matters require a judicially exercised discretion on the basis of a prima facie assessment, without detailed evaluation of evidence. It noted that economic offences may call for a cautious approach, but the settled principles governing bail remain applicable, including the nature of accusation, severity of punishment, possibility of tampering with evidence, and likelihood of absconding. On the materials collected, the Court found a prima facie case of involvement in bogus input tax credit transactions, but also observed that the investigation had substantially concluded, the final police report had been filed, the relevant documentary material had been gathered, and the petitioner was a local resident with a low risk of flight. The Court further took into account the length of custody and the unlikelihood of early completion of trial.

Conclusion: Bail was granted with stringent conditions, and the petitioner was directed to be released on bail.

Final Conclusion: The prosecution was permitted to continue, but pre-trial liberty was restored to the petitioner subject to safeguards intended to secure attendance and protect the evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: Even in economic offences, bail may be granted where investigation is substantially complete, the evidence is largely documentary, and the risk of absconding or tampering is adequately controlled by conditions.

---