TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision on Section 14A disallowance</h1> <h3>DCIT, Circle - 4 (1) Gurgaon Versus M/s Uniquest Infra Ventures Pvt. Ltd.</h3> DCIT, Circle - 4 (1) Gurgaon Versus M/s Uniquest Infra Ventures Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Act.2. Interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014.3. Permission to add, delete, or amend grounds of appeal.Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 14A of the ActThe case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning the disallowance of Rs. 1,56,40,968 under Section 14A of the Act for Assessment Year 2015-16. The appellant, a company engaged in infrastructure projects, had filed its return of income showing a total loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) made the disallowance, which was subsequently deleted by the CIT(A) on the grounds that the appellant had not earned any exempt income. The CIT(A) relied on a decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to support this conclusion. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that in the absence of exempt income, no disallowance under Section 14A could be made.Issue 2: Interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014The second ground raised by the Revenue was related to the interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014, which clarified the disallowance under Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in ignoring this circular. However, the ITAT did not delve into this aspect as the primary issue was the disallowance under Section 14A, and no fallacy in the CIT(A)'s decision was pointed out by the Revenue.Issue 3: Permission to add, delete, or amend grounds of appealThe appellant sought permission to add, delete, or amend grounds of appeal, which was a procedural matter. However, since the primary issue of disallowance under Section 14A was the focus of the appeal, the ITAT did not address this request separately in its judgment.In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act due to the absence of exempt income. The judgment highlighted the importance of factual findings and legal precedents in determining the applicability of tax provisions, emphasizing the need for a clear nexus between income earned and disallowances made under the Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
