Town seizure of foreign-origin gold: baggage duty rate inapplicable, classification under Chapter Heading 71081300, and excess duty refundable with interest.

Foreign-origin gold intercepted during travel within India was treated as a town seizure, not as baggage imported from abroad, because there was no evidence of entry into India from a foreign country. On that basis, the baggage rate of duty was inapplicable and the goods were classifiable under Chapter Heading 71081300, attracting duty at 12.5%. Since duty had already been paid on a higher basis, the excess amount was refundable with applicable interest. The document therefore explains that the duty demand based on baggage import could not stand and that duty had to be computed under the gold tariff heading.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in a case of town seizure of foreign-origin gold carried within India, the rate of duty applicable was the baggage rate or the rate applicable to gold under Chapter Heading 71081300, and whether the appellant was entitled to refund of excess duty with interest.

Analysis: The gold was intercepted while the appellant was travelling by bus from Bahraich to Barabanki, and there was no evidence of any entry into India from a foreign country. On these facts, the matter was a town seizure and not an import of baggage. The baggage rate of duty was therefore inapplicable. The gold was classifiable under Chapter Heading 71081300, and duty was payable at 12.5% as applicable to that heading. Since the appellant had already deposited duty on the higher basis, the excess amount became refundable with applicable interest.

Conclusion: The duty demand based on baggage import was unsustainable. The appellant was held entitled to duty computation at 12.5% under Chapter Heading 71081300 and to refund of the excess duty deposited with interest.

---