Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Approves Company Amalgamation Scheme with Conditions; Assets and Liabilities Transferred to Transferee Company.</h1> <h3>IN RE : COMSTAR AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED, SONA BLW PRECISION FORGINGS LIMITED</h3> IN RE : COMSTAR AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED, SONA BLW PRECISION FORGINGS LIMITED - TMI Issues Involved:1. Sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013.2. Compliance with statutory requirements and issuance of notices.3. Objections from statutory authorities and creditors.4. Compliance with Section 232(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding fees on consolidated authorized share capital.5. Transfer of liabilities and obligations including pending litigations and tax demands.6. Approval from Competition Commission of India (CCI).7. Compliance with stock exchanges and SEBI requirements.8. Final sanction and conditions imposed by the Tribunal.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013:The petitioner companies filed a joint Second Motion petition under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the sanction of a Scheme of Amalgamation. The Tribunal reviewed the First Motion Application and subsequent compliance affidavits, confirming that all procedural requirements were met.2. Compliance with statutory requirements and issuance of notices:The Tribunal issued directions on 23.07.2021, which were complied with by the petitioner companies through an affidavit dated 09.09.2021. Notices were served to statutory authorities including the Central Government, Registrar of Companies, CCI, RBI, and Income Tax Department, and were published in newspapers.3. Objections from statutory authorities and creditors:The statutory authorities, including the Registrar of Companies (RoC) and Regional Director (RD), filed their reports with observations. The RoC confirmed that the companies had filed annual returns and balance sheets up to 31.03.2020 and had no pending prosecutions, inspections, or investigations. The Official Liquidator also filed a report with no adverse observations.4. Compliance with Section 232(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding fees on consolidated authorized share capital:The RoC observed that the Transferee Company must comply with Section 232(3)(i) and pay the difference fee on consolidated authorized share capital. The petitioner companies undertook to comply with this requirement and pay applicable fees post-consolidation.5. Transfer of liabilities and obligations including pending litigations and tax demands:The Income Tax Department reported outstanding demands against both petitioner companies. The petitioner companies confirmed that all pending litigations and liabilities, including tax demands, would be transferred to the Transferee Company. The Tribunal noted that the rights of tax authorities to recover dues remain intact and can proceed against the Transferee Company.6. Approval from Competition Commission of India (CCI):The CCI approved the proposed combination, stating that it would not have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India.7. Compliance with stock exchanges and SEBI requirements:Notices were issued to the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE), Bombay Stock Exchange of India (BSE), and Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). No objections were received from these authorities, indicating presumed approval.8. Final sanction and conditions imposed by the Tribunal:The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation, confirming compliance with all statutory requirements. It clarified that the order does not exempt the companies from paying stamp duty, taxes, or other charges. The Tribunal ordered the transfer of all property, rights, liabilities, and employees from the Transferor Company to the Transferee Company. It also mandated the filing of revised memorandum and articles of association with the Registrar of Companies and the payment of differential fees. The Transferor Company was ordered to be dissolved without winding up, and the Transferee Company was directed to deposit Rs. 50,000 in favor of 'The Company Law Tribunal Bar Association' within four weeks.Conclusion:The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between the petitioner companies, ensuring compliance with all statutory requirements and protecting the rights of creditors and tax authorities. The order includes specific conditions for the transfer of assets, liabilities, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found