Tax Tribunal Cancels Penalty for Late Tax Audit Report, Emphasizes Need for Reasonable Cause

The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271B for delayed filing of the tax audit report for the assessment year 2014-15. It held that the appellant had shown a reasonable cause for the delay, citing strained relations with the initial Chartered Accountant as justification. Emphasizing that the non-electronic filing did not warrant penalty, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, highlighting the importance of proving reasonable cause for non-compliance with statutory provisions.

---

---

Issues:
Penalty under section 271B for delayed filing of tax audit report for assessment year 2014-15.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Late filing of tax audit report
The appellant challenged the penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 imposed under section 271B for filing the tax audit report after the due date. The return of income was filed on 30.11.2014, but the audit report was submitted on 09-12-2016 during assessment proceedings, leading to penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO).

Issue 2: Reasons for delay
The appellant explained that the initial auditors made errors in the accounts, prompting a change to a new Chartered Accountant (CA) who provided the accurate tax audit report. The AO noted the delay in appointing the new CA and filing the report just 23 days before the assessment deadline. The appellant cited strained relations with the earlier CA as the cause for the delay.

Issue 3: Legal provisions and authorities
The penalty under section 271B is discretionary and not mandatory, as per the Hyderabad Special Bench of ITAT. The provision exempts penalty if a reasonable cause is proven. The Andhra Pradesh High Court defined "reasonable cause" as one that satisfies a reasonable mind, supporting the appellant's argument of strained relations with the earlier CA.

Issue 4: Arguments and findings
The appellant argued that the delay had a reasonable cause and the report was filed before completion of assessment. The Department contended that timely filing is crucial for scrutiny selection. The Tribunal found the strained relationship with the earlier CA to be a reasonable cause for the delay, emphasizing that the non-electronic filing did not warrant penalty under section 271B.

Conclusion
The Tribunal held that there was a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the tax audit report, overturning the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) and directing the AO to delete the penalty under section 271B for the relevant assessment year. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proving a reasonable cause for non-compliance with statutory provisions.

This detailed analysis provides an overview of the issues, arguments, legal provisions, and the final decision of the Appellate Tribunal in the case concerning the penalty under section 271B for the delayed filing of the tax audit report.

---