Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could reopen the approved price lists and disallow deduction of transportation charges on the footing that the freight was equalised freight.
Analysis: The deduction towards transport charges had already been accepted in the approved price lists. Rule 173-C of the Central Excise Rules was treated as a provision intended to give finality to an approved price list, and the respondents were held not empowered to reopen that determination merely on the assertion that the freight was equalised freight. The Court also accepted that the petitioner was entitled in law to deduction of transportation charges, whether computed on average freight or actual transportation cost, and held that the impugned attempt to revise the allowance was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The challenge to the reopening of transport charges succeeded and the disallowance was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An approved price list cannot be reopened under Rule 173-C of the Central Excise Rules to disallow transportation charges where the deduction has already been accepted and the assessee is otherwise entitled to such deduction.