Tribunal denies insolvency process, grants debtor extension due to COVID-19 impact

The Tribunal declined to initiate the corporate insolvency resolution process against the respondent, a corporate debtor, despite acknowledging the admitted financial debt. Emphasizing the importance of not misusing insolvency proceedings against solvent companies, the Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to repay the debt due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and legislative changes. The respondent was directed to repay the debt within six months, with the option for the petitioner to file a new petition if needed, and no costs were awarded in the judgment.

---

---

Issues:
Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 based on default in payment.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a financial creditor, filed a petition seeking to initiate the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor due to a default amounting to Rs. 27,39,899.33 as on November 30, 2019. The petitioner had granted Export Finance Facility to the corporate debtor under various agreements, including the receivables purchase factoring agreement and an irrevocable undertaking for recourse. The corporate debtor failed to make payments towards the assigned invoices, leading to a commercial dispute with another party. Despite reminders and demand letters, the corporate debtor did not respond or make payments, establishing a default in financial debt. The respondent failed to file any objections despite legal representation, indicating acknowledgment of the debt.

Upon review of the relevant agreements and documents, it was confirmed that the corporate debtor admitted to a financial debt of USD 4,00,000 or its rupee equivalent along with interest. However, the Tribunal considered important legal precedents, emphasizing that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not meant to be misused to jeopardize the financial stability of a solvent company. The Tribunal noted the financial health of the respondent, as evidenced by its active compliance, manufacturing activities, assets, and revenue growth, indicating solvency.

Acknowledging the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and legislative changes to protect industries, the Tribunal decided to grant the respondent more time to repay the debt. Despite the petitioner's argument for admission, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of not pushing a solvent company into insolvency, especially in the current economic climate. Therefore, the Tribunal disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to repay the debt within six months, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh petition if necessary. No costs were awarded in the judgment.

---