Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the common oral judgment rejecting the applicants' pre-arrest bail applications could be recalled.
Analysis: The applications sought recall of the earlier order on the ground that certain submissions, factual materials, and statutory provisions were not specifically dealt with. The governing position is that a criminal court has no power of review under Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, though recall may be permissible in narrow circumstances, particularly where an order is passed in breach of the principles of natural justice. The material on record showed that the earlier judgment had already considered the parties' submissions, the relevant statutory provisions, and the prosecution material. The present applications merely attempted to re-argue the matter on merits and did not disclose any violation of natural justice or any other exceptional ground warranting recall.
Conclusion: The recall applications were not maintainable and were rightly dismissed.