2021 (12) TMI 984 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal corrects error in CIT(A) order, directs fresh adjudication on interest disallowance for fair tax assessment

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Assessee, highlighting a mistake apparent from the record in the order of the CIT (A) regarding the disallowance of ... Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - deduction of interest expenses on loan - CIT (A) in his order under section 250 has disallowed the interest expenses on the reasoning that the assessee failed to produce any documentary evidence suggesting that the assessee has taken loan for the construction of the cinema hall building - HELD THAT:- Since the learned CIT (A) himself has admitted that the building for the cinema was constructed out of the loan which was also repaid by the assessee, then to our understanding, the learned CIT (A) cannot disallow the interest expenses by holding that that there was no document concerning the loan furnished by the assessee. In fact, we are of the view that the learned CIT (A) has given contradictory finding in his order dated 19th March 2019 under section 250 of the Act, which amounts to a mistake apparent from record and the same is liable to be corrected under the provisions of section 154 of the Act. We also note that the assessee before the learned CIT (A) in the proceedings under section 154 of the Act has submitted that, as evident from the statement of facts filed along with rectification application, the loan was taken by the assessee for the purpose of purchasing the equipment, plant, furniture and construction of the cinema building. But the learned CIT (A) in his order under section 154 of the Act without rejecting the contention of the assessee has reached to the conclusion that there is no mistake apparent in the order passed under section 250 of the Act dated 18-03-2019. Thus the order of the learned CIT (A) seems to be a non-speaking order. CIT (A) was under the obligation to reject the contentions of the assessee with reasoning. But he has not done so. Accordingly, in the interest of justice and fair play, we are setting aside the issue to the file of the CIT (A) for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law after considering the documents of the assessee and after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes. Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Issues:1. Rectification order disallowing interest on secured term loans2. Mistake apparent from record in the order of the CIT (A)Issue 1: Rectification order disallowing interest on secured term loansThe appeal was filed by the Assessee against the order of the CIT (A) regarding the disallowance of interest on secured term loans from the bank. The AO disallowed the claim of the Assessee for a significant amount and added it to the total income, stating that the cinema building did not belong to the Assessee. The CIT (A) confirmed the addition of interest on the loan, highlighting the lack of evidence proving that the loan was taken by the Assessee specifically for the cinema building. The Assessee contended that the loan was taken in their name as per the bank's sanction letter and that the cinema hall building was indeed constructed using the loan obtained by them. However, the CIT (A) rejected the contention, leading the Assessee to move an application under section 154 of the Act, which was also rejected by the CIT (A).Issue 2: Mistake apparent from record in the order of the CIT (A)The Tribunal analyzed the facts of the case, emphasizing that the loan was taken by the Assessee for the construction of the cinema hall building. The Tribunal noted that the CIT (A) had admitted this fact in a previous order but still disallowed the interest expenses, citing lack of documentary evidence. The Tribunal found this to be a contradictory finding by the CIT (A) and considered it a mistake apparent from the record. Additionally, the Tribunal highlighted that the CIT (A) did not provide reasoning for rejecting the Assessee's contentions, leading to the decision to set aside the issue for fresh adjudication by the CIT (A) after considering the documents and providing a reasonable opportunity for the Assessee to be heard. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Assessee for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Assessee, pointing out the mistake apparent from the record in the order of the CIT (A) regarding the disallowance of interest on secured term loans. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper consideration of evidence and reasoning in tax assessments to ensure fair play and justice in such matters.