TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeals, emphasizes evidence-based tax assessments, prevents arbitrary disallowances</h1> <h3>Rajiv Gupta Versus ITO, Ward-63 (5), New Delhi.</h3> Rajiv Gupta Versus ITO, Ward-63 (5), New Delhi. - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of expenses out of salary, staff welfare, and bonus claimed in the P&L Account for the assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16.Analysis:For the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee filed a return of income declaring &8377; 8,38,360, which was later revised to &8377; 27,75,170 by the Assessing Officer. The disallowances included &8377; 14,38,628 related to salary, staff welfare, and bonus expenses. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, confirming the addition of &8377; 14,38,628. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, found that the disallowance was made without sufficient evidence and reasoning. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, stating that no disallowance can be made purely on guesswork without proper findings based on evidence.Moving to the assessment year 2015-16, similar grounds were raised by the assessee regarding the disallowance of &8377; 13,93,501 out of salary, staff welfare, and bonus claimed in the P&L Account. The Tribunal, following the same reasoning as in the previous year, allowed the appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition. The decision highlighted the importance of evidence-based findings rather than arbitrary disallowances based on assumptions.In both cases, the Tribunal emphasized the need for authorities to provide concrete evidence and reasoning for disallowing expenses claimed by the assessee. The judgments underscored that disallowances cannot be made solely on conjectures or without proper substantiation. The Tribunal's consistent view across both appeals emphasized the requirement for a factual basis and evidentiary support for any disallowances made by tax authorities.In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed both appeals of the assessee for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed expenses from the P&L Account. The judgments highlighted the importance of a reasoned and evidence-based approach in tax assessments, ensuring fair treatment for taxpayers and preventing arbitrary disallowances based on mere assumptions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
