TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules Finance Act amendments not retrospective, grants relief on ESI/PF contributions</h1> <h3>M/s. System Consultants Information India Private Limited Versus DCIT, Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru</h3> M/s. System Consultants Information India Private Limited Versus DCIT, Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru - TMI Issues: Appeal against CIT(A) order regarding employees' share of contribution to ESI and PF, applicability of newly inserted explanations to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, retrospective effect of Finance Act, 2021 amendments.Analysis:1. Employees' Share of Contribution to ESI: The assessee, a Private Limited Company, filed a return for AY 2017-18 declaring total income. The Centralized Processing Centre added an amount representing employees' share of contribution to ESI due to non-payment before the specified due date. The assessee contended that the contribution was paid before the due date for filing the return, citing relevant judicial decisions supporting the deductibility of such payments.2. Amendments to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B: The CIT(A) referred to the Finance Act, 2021 amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act. The amendments inserted Explanation-2 to section 36(1)(va) and Explanation-5 to section 43B, clarifying the non-applicability of section 43B for determining the 'due date' under section 36(1)(va) and exempting sums received from employees. The CIT(A) emphasized the distinction between employees' and employer's contributions, noting different treatment under the Act and judicial recognition of this differentiation.3. Applicability and Retrospective Effect: The CIT(A) held that the amendments were declaratory/clarificatory and applied retrospectively. However, the tribunal found that the amendments were applicable only from 01.04.2021, based on the explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act, 2021. Considering previous decisions and the absence of specific retrospective language in the amendments, the tribunal concluded that the additions made under section 36(1)(va) should be deleted, allowing the appeal of the assessee.4. Judicial Precedents and High Court Decision: The tribunal referred to various decisions, including the view of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd., supporting the deductibility of employees' contributions under section 36(1)(va) if paid before the due date for filing the return. The tribunal highlighted the importance of legislative intent in determining the retrospective application of amendments and emphasized the need for clear language to establish retroactive effect.5. Final Decision: The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that the Finance Act, 2021 amendments did not have retrospective effect before 01.04.2021. The tribunal's decision aligned with previous interpretations and judicial precedents, providing relief to the assessee regarding the deductibility of employees' share of contributions to ESI and PF.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
