TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of taxpayer, rejects Revenue's appeal on assessment and profit addition.</h1> <h3>Income Tax Officer, Ward-25 (3), New Delhi Versus M/s. Time Bound Contracts Private Ltd.</h3> Income Tax Officer, Ward-25 (3), New Delhi Versus M/s. Time Bound Contracts Private Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of assessment under section 153C read with section 153A.2. Deletion of various additions by the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2006-07.3. Deletion of addition of profit from sale of land for the assessment year 2012-13.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Assessment under Section 153C Read with Section 153A:The primary issue was whether the assessment completed under section 153C read with section 153A was valid. The CIT(A) quashed the assessment as void ab initio, relying on the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. M/s RRJ Securities Ltd., which stated that the reference date for initiating action under section 153C is the date of handing over the material, not the date of the search. The documents were handed over to the jurisdictional AO on 05/04/2013, making the relevant assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. Consequently, the notice for assessment year 2006-07 was beyond the six-year limitation period. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground.2. Deletion of Various Additions by the CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2006-07:Since the Tribunal upheld the quashing of the assessment proceedings under section 153C, the other grounds raised by the Revenue concerning the deletion of various additions by the CIT(A) became academic and were not adjudicated upon. These included:- Deletion of Rs. 39,112,550/- by relying on CIT vs. Kabul Chawla.- Deletion of Rs. 8,871,950/- and Rs. 1,000,000/- based on documents furnished during appellate proceedings.- Deletion of Rs. 6,400,000/- concerning cash deposits.- Deletion of Rs. 23,840,600/- based on documents furnished during appellate proceedings.3. Deletion of Addition of Profit from Sale of Land for the Assessment Year 2012-13:The CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 18,719,545/- made by the AO on account of profit from the sale of land. The AO had added this amount based on the sale of developed plots by M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd., where the assessee was the registered owner. The CIT(A) found that the land was held on behalf of M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd., and the profit from the sale was declared by them. The AO failed to bring any evidence that the assessee sold the land. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that taxing the same income in the hands of both the assessee and M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd. was unjustified. The Revenue's appeal on this ground was also dismissed.Conclusion:In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, quashing the assessment under section 153C read with section 153A for the assessment year 2006-07 and deleting the addition of profit from the sale of land for the assessment year 2012-13. Both appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
