Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter required restoration to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in view of the assessee's grievance regarding non-service of notice and denial of reasonable opportunity, and the addition sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals).
Analysis: The assessment had been reopened under section 147 and notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued, but the assessee claimed that no effective service or opportunity had been afforded. The Commissioner (Appeals) had deleted part of the addition and sustained the balance towards margin money. In view of the complaint that the assessee had not been given a proper chance to explain the source of the margin money, the matter required reconsideration by the Assessing Officer. To secure the ends of justice, the issue was restored for one more opportunity and fresh decision in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after granting the assessee a further opportunity to substantiate its case.