Proforma credit under Central Excise law applies when duty-paid inputs are processed outside the factory and returned for manufacture.

Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 allowed proforma credit where duty-paid material or component parts were sent outside the factory for operations necessary for manufacture and then returned for use in producing excisable goods. On the stated facts, electrical stampings sent out for conversion into die-cast rotors and brought back for manufacture of electric motors fell within that procedure. The refusal to extend credit did not properly address the scope of Rule 56A(7) or the exemption notification linked to compliance with that rule, so the petitioner was entitled to the facility subject to conditions imposed by the Collector.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to avail proforma credit under Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, when duty-paid electrical stampings were sent outside the factory for conversion into die-cast rotors and returned for use in the manufacture of electric motors.

Analysis: Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 empowered exemption by notification, and the exemption notification in question required compliance with the procedure under Rule 56A. Rule 56A(7) specifically permitted removal of material or component parts to a place outside the factory for operations necessary for manufacture and their return for further use in the manufacture of excisable goods. The petitioner's case fell within that procedure because the stampings were sent out only to obtain die-cast rotors for use in the manufacture of electric motors. The rejection order did not properly address this position or the applicability of the sub-rule to the petitioner's arrangement.

Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to avail the proforma credit facility subject to such conditions as the Collector might impose under Rule 56A(7), and the refusal was not sustainable.

---