TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal partially allows appeal on bonus & salaries, directs AO to allow Rs. 15,75,000 bonus claim. Disallowance reduced to 8%.</h1> <h3>Nagaraj Kurapati, Hyderabad. Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward – 4 (1), Hyderabad</h3> Nagaraj Kurapati, Hyderabad. Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward – 4 (1), Hyderabad - TMI Issues:1. Addition of bonus payable, salaries, and cash credits in capital account.2. Disallowance of bonus and salaries.3. Unexplained investment in capital account.Analysis:Issue 1: Addition of Bonus Payable, Salaries, and Cash Credits in Capital Account- The appeal was against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the addition of Rs. 28,01,659 made towards Bonus Payable, Salaries, and Cash credits in the capital account for AY 2013-14 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.- The appellant argued that the bonus outstanding amounting to Rs. 15,75,000 was paid before the due date of filing the return of income, making it allowable under section 36(1)(ii) of the Act. The appellant contended that the addition towards Bonus payable was incorrect as the bonus was paid within the allowed time.- The Tribunal found that the bonus was indeed paid before the due date for filing the return of income, and hence, directed the AO to allow the claim of bonus amounting to Rs. 15,75,000. Ground No. 3 was allowed.Issue 2: Disallowance of Bonus and Salaries- The AO disallowed Rs. 11,61,659 as an ad hoc disallowance of 10% of salaries without proper material or evidence on record.- The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance stating that the appellant did not provide identification documents of employees to prove the genuineness of the payments.- The Tribunal noted that the appellant failed to provide complete identification documents of employees. To ensure justice, the disallowance was reduced to 8% of the salary expenditure, amounting to Rs. 1,16,16,589. Ground No. 4 was partly allowed.Issue 3: Unexplained Investment in Capital Account- An amount of Rs. 65,000 was treated as unexplained investment as it was not supported by documentary evidence and added to the returned income.- The CIT(A) confirmed the addition as the capital addition was not backed by any documentary evidence.- The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' findings as the amounts were not recorded in the cash book, dismissing the appellant's argument that the credits may relate to cash withdrawals for business purposes. Ground No. 5 was dismissed.Conclusion:- The appeal was partly allowed with regards to the bonus and salaries disallowance, while the addition of unexplained investment in the capital account was upheld. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced on 26th November 2021.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
