Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether vegetable non-essential oil used in the manufacture of hardened vegetable oil classified as vegetable product under tariff item 13, and ultimately used in soap manufacture, qualified for exemption under Notification No. 33/63-Central Excise, or became liable to duty because the finished excisable goods were themselves fully exempt.
Analysis: The exemption under clause (b) of Notification No. 33/63-Central Excise applied where vegetable non-essential oil, after processing, was used in the manufacture of goods falling under tariff items 13, 14 or 15. The second proviso denied that exemption where the finished excisable goods produced by the manufacturer were themselves exempt from the whole of the duty or chargeable to nil rate. On the facts, the petitioners had themselves treated the hardened oil as a finished excisable product falling under tariff item 13 and had obtained exemption for that product under Notification No. CER-8(3)/56-Central Excise dated 14.01.1956. In that setting, the hardened oil, and not the later soap manufacture, was the relevant finished excisable goods for the proviso. Since that finished product was wholly exempt, the oil used to make it could not claim exemption under Notification No. 33/63-Central Excise.
Conclusion: The petitioners were not entitled to exemption on vegetable non-essential oil under Notification No. 33/63-Central Excise, and duty was payable.