Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. where the inputs were cleared at nil rate of duty and were not duty-paid.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. applied only when the final products were manufactured from specified inputs on which duty of excise had already been paid. The explanatory clause created a deeming fiction for stocks of inputs in the country, except those clearly recognizable as non-duty paid. After the amendment by Notification No. 63/91-C.E., the phrase excluding stocks charged to nil rate of duty was omitted, but the remaining explanation still excluded clearly recognizable non-duty paid inputs. In the light of the binding interpretation of the phrase "duty paid" and the clarification that nil-rated goods cannot be treated as duty paid, inputs cleared at nil rate remained non-duty paid for purposes of the exemption. The Board circular also supported this interpretation.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the exemption, and the demand was sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification requires duty-paid inputs, goods cleared at nil rate of duty are to be treated as non-duty paid and do not satisfy the condition for exemption, notwithstanding a deeming explanation in the notification.