Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether white cement and ordinary portland cement are the same commercial commodity for the purpose of import control and customs action, and whether the refusal to clear the imported goods was lawful.
Analysis: The governing test was whether the goods were understood in commercial parlance as one or distinct commodities. The Court relied on the statutory definition in the Imported Cement (Control) Order, 1978, the material in the Indian Standards Institution publications, and the Government press note to hold that white cement and ordinary portland cement were treated separately in trade, use, and composition. On that basis, the Customs authorities' contrary view was held to be unreasonable and perverse, and the import of white cement could not be treated as a prohibited or canalised import of ordinary cement.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the petitioner. White cement was held to be a distinct commodity, the import was held to be valid, and the refusal to clear the goods and the consequential adjudication order were held illegal and without jurisdiction.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the adjudication proceedings and confiscatory directions were quashed, and clearance of the goods was ordered.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory regime and accepted trade understanding treat two articles as distinct commercial commodities, Customs cannot override that position by relying on a contrary view unsupported by the governing control order and authoritative trade description.