Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether input tax credit was admissible on purchases made from dealers whose registrations had already been cancelled, and whether interference in writ jurisdiction was warranted despite the statutory appeal remedy.
Analysis: The purchases were found to have been made after the cancellation of the selling dealers' registrations. On that factual basis, the claim to input tax credit was rejected under the governing value added tax framework. The availability of a statutory appeal under the Act also weighed against granting writ relief, while permitting the assessee to pursue the appellate remedy.
Conclusion: The claim for input tax credit was rejected and the writ challenge failed. The assessee was left to work out the statutory appeal remedy.
Final Conclusion: The assessment order was sustained, and the assessee was directed to pursue the prescribed appellate channel for any further relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Input tax credit is not available where the purchases are made after the cancellation of the selling dealer's registration, and writ relief may be declined when an effective statutory appeal remedy is available.