Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiac) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that it was substantially financed by the Government, and whether interest earned on grant funds had to be included while computing the extent of Government financing.
Analysis: The exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiac) depended upon the institution being wholly or substantially financed by the Government. The relevant explanation and Rule 2BBB of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 prescribed the applicable threshold, and the General Financial Rules also supported inclusion of interest earned on grants-in-aid as part of the grant structure. On the facts, the funding received from the Government, including interest, crossed the prescribed percentage. The reasoning also recognized that Government financing is not confined to annual recurring grants alone and may include support for land, infrastructure, construction, machinery, and related institutional funding.
Conclusion: The assessee satisfied the requirement of being substantially financed by the Government and was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiac); the Revenue's challenge failed.