Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the Appellate Tribunal required reconsideration in light of the later circular clarifying the tax treatment of margin trading profit under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
Analysis: The matter was not examined on merits. The Court noted that the subsequent clarification order dated 06.10.2016, relied upon by the dealer, had not been placed before the Tribunal. In these circumstances, the Tribunal was held to be the proper authority to reconsider the controversy by taking into account the circular and the material the parties wished to rely upon, along with the dealer's factual explanation regarding the nature of margin trading profit and its alleged exclusion from the statutory concepts of sale and turnover.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration; the question whether margin trading profit forms part of turnover was left open for decision by the Tribunal.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded to the extent of securing a remand, with no adjudication on the substantive taxability issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a relevant subsequent circular or clarification bearing on the tax treatment of a disputed receipt was not considered by the fact-finding authority, the proper course is to remit the matter for fresh adjudication rather than decide the controversy on merits.