Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer, after remand of issues by the Tribunal, was required to pass a draft assessment order under section 144C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 before finalising the assessment, and whether failure to do so rendered the final assessment order unsustainable.
Analysis: The assessment arose after the Tribunal had remanded certain issues for fresh consideration. In such a situation, the Assessing Officer was bound to follow the procedure prescribed for eligible assessees and first issue a draft assessment order. The final assessment order was passed directly without this step. The omission was treated as a violation of the mandatory procedure under section 144C(1) and as a defect that could not be cured by section 292B.
Conclusion: The omission to pass a draft assessment order after remand was a fatal procedural defect, and the deletion of the additions was upheld. The Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The assessment made without compliance with the mandatory draft-order procedure could not be sustained, so the Revenue appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where section 144C(1) applies, the Assessing Officer must first issue a draft assessment order before completing the assessment, and failure to do so is a non-curable jurisdictional defect.