Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the notification dated 12 October 1974 granting rebate of excise duty on sugar, the percentage slabs in Item 2 were to be worked out with reference to the actual excess production over the average production of the preceding five sugar years or with reference to the average production itself.
Analysis: The notification, issued in exercise of the power under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, granted rebate on sugar produced in excess of the average production of the corresponding period of the preceding five sugar years. The dispute turned on the meaning of the slab expressions such as "on excess production up to 7.5%" and "on excess production on the next 10%". The Court accepted the construction that these expressions relate to percentages of the excess production itself, and not to percentages of the average production of the previous five years. That reading was consistent with the plain language of the notification and with the view taken by other High Courts that had interpreted the same notification.
Conclusion: The rebate had to be calculated on the basis of actual excess production, and not with reference to the average production of the corresponding period of the preceding five sugar years.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption or rebate notification grants slab-wise relief on "excess production", the slab percentages are to be applied to the excess production itself unless the notification expressly provides otherwise.