Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Corporate Debtor should be put into liquidation and the Resolution Professional appointed as Liquidator.
Analysis: The Committee of Creditors had, with 100% voting share, resolved to seek liquidation after repeated opportunities for submission of a resolution plan did not result in any viable plan. The Tribunal noted the expiry of the CIRP period, the failure of prospective resolution applicants to submit plans despite extensions, and the CoC's express approval to move for liquidation. In view of the statutory framework governing liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Tribunal found that the prerequisites for commencement of liquidation were satisfied and that the proposed Resolution Professional had given consent and disclosed the absence of disciplinary proceedings.
Conclusion: The application was allowed. The Corporate Debtor was directed to be liquidated, and the Resolution Professional was appointed as the Liquidator under Section 34(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Committee of Creditors, exercising its commercial wisdom, resolves to liquidate the Corporate Debtor after the CIRP fails to yield an approved resolution plan, the Adjudicating Authority may order liquidation and appoint the proposed liquidator in accordance with the Code.