Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be compounded at the revisional stage after the accused deposits the entire compensation amount and the complainant consents to such compounding.
Analysis: The entire compensation amount awarded by the courts below stood deposited with the trial court. The complainant expressed readiness to compound the matter on release of the deposited amount. In view of the statutory power to compound offences under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Court accepted the request for compounding notwithstanding the prior conviction, and directed release of the deposited amount to the complainant.
Conclusion: The offence was validly compounded, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the accused stood acquitted.
Ratio Decidendi: An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 may be compounded even after conviction when the complainant consents and the compensatory amount has been paid or deposited.