Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for debiting an import licence, customs authorities could use the international market value assessed for customs duty or were bound to debit the actual c.i.f. value of the goods imported under the licence.
Analysis: The scheme of the Imports (Control) Order, 1955 and the licensing instructions showed that the licence was granted in terms of rupees to regulate foreign exchange utilisation on the basis of the importer's actual c.i.f. commitment, while customs duty was separately assessable under section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the price at the time and place of importation. The definition inserted in clause 2(e) of the Imports (Control) Order did not alter that position. Clause 10A required honest declaration of value by the importer, but did not authorise customs to substitute the international market price for the actual c.i.f. value debitable against the licence. Paragraph 300 of the Handbook, properly read, referred to the c.i.f. value of the goods imported for customs purposes and not to a revaluation that would override the licensing policy or the substantive statute.
Conclusion: The debitable value under the licence was the actual c.i.f. value, not the international market value assessed for customs duty. The challenge to the policy decision and debit entry failed.