Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (11) TMI 666 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Violations of CBLR Regulations, Emphasizes Due Diligence The Tribunal upheld violations of Regulations 10(b), 10(k), 10(n), and 13(12) of CBLR, 2018, but did not find sufficient grounds to uphold the violation ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds Violations of CBLR Regulations, Emphasizes Due Diligence

                          The Tribunal upheld violations of Regulations 10(b), 10(k), 10(n), and 13(12) of CBLR, 2018, but did not find sufficient grounds to uphold the violation of Regulation 10(d). The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was largely upheld, emphasizing the significance of due diligence, accurate record-keeping, and proper employee supervision by Customs Brokers.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Violation of Regulation 10(b) of CBLR, 2018
                          2. Violation of Regulation 10(d) of CBLR, 2018
                          3. Violation of Regulation 10(k) of CBLR, 2018
                          4. Violation of Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018
                          5. Violation of Regulation 13(12) of CBLR, 2018

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Violation of Regulation 10(b) of CBLR, 2018:
                          The appellant, a licensed Customs Broker, was found to have contravened Regulation 10(b) as it did not transact business in the Customs station either personally or through its authorized employee. Instead, the carting of goods was done by Shri Inder Prakash Kohli, who was neither an employee nor authorized by the appellant. This action was deemed a violation because it bypassed the requirement that only the Customs Broker or its authorized employee should handle such tasks, ensuring accountability and preventing fraud. The Tribunal upheld this finding, emphasizing that allowing unauthorized persons to transact business in the Customs House opens the door to potential fraud and undermines the regulatory framework.

                          2. Violation of Regulation 10(d) of CBLR, 2018:
                          Regulation 10(d) mandates that the Customs Broker must advise his client to comply with the provisions of the Act and report any non-compliance to the Customs authorities. The Commissioner found that the appellant failed to advise the exporter against gross over-invoicing of goods. However, the Tribunal noted that the Customs Broker is not required to assess or know the correct value of the goods being exported. There was no evidence that the appellant was aware of the exporter's violations and failed to report them. Consequently, the Tribunal did not uphold the finding of a violation of Regulation 10(d).

                          3. Violation of Regulation 10(k) of CBLR, 2018:
                          Regulation 10(k) requires the Customs Broker to maintain up-to-date records of documents related to their business. The appellant failed to produce KYC documents for the exporter, which were allegedly received via email. This failure indicated that the appellant did not maintain the necessary records, violating Regulation 10(k). The Tribunal upheld this finding, stressing the importance of maintaining accurate and complete records to ensure compliance and accountability.

                          4. Violation of Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018:
                          Regulation 10(n) requires the Customs Broker to verify the correctness of the Importer Exporter Code number, GST identification number, identity, and functioning of the client at the declared address using reliable documents. The appellant did not verify the exporter's details and relied solely on documents provided by Mr. Kohli. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to conduct due diligence, resulting in the filing of documents with grossly overvalued goods. This lack of verification was deemed a violation of Regulation 10(n).

                          5. Violation of Regulation 13(12) of CBLR, 2018:
                          Regulation 13(12) holds the Customs Broker responsible for the acts or omissions of its employees. The appellant's employee, Shri Kadam, acted without proper authorization and failed to verify the exporter's details. The Tribunal emphasized that the Customs Broker is vicariously liable for the actions of its employees. The appellant's failure to supervise and ensure proper conduct of its employees constituted a violation of Regulation 13(12).

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal upheld the findings of violations of Regulations 10(b), 10(k), 10(n), and 13(12) of CBLR, 2018, but did not find sufficient grounds to uphold the violation of Regulation 10(d). The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was largely upheld, reinforcing the importance of due diligence, accurate record-keeping, and proper supervision by Customs Brokers.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found