CENVAT refund under Rule 5 turns on eligibility of input services, not strict nexus, though unsupported service use can still fail.

Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was applied to refund of accumulated credit for exported services, with the broader principle that strict correlation between the exported output service and each input service is not required where the services are otherwise eligible. On that basis, Advertising Agency Services were treated as eligible input services, and the refund denial was held unsustainable for those services. Pandal or Shamiana Services were excluded because use for staff events was not satisfactorily established. Real Estate Agent and Consultant Service was also excluded because its connection with the rented premises was not adequately shown.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund of accumulated CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was wrongly denied in respect of certain input services, including Advertising Agency Services, Pandal or Shamiana Services, and Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services.

Analysis: The denial of refund was examined on the basis of the eligibility of the disputed input services and the alleged absence of nexus with exported services. The prior decisions of the same Bench and other authorities were followed on the broader principle that the amended Rule 5 does not require strict correlation between the output service exported and the input services used. On that basis, most of the disputed services were treated as eligible input services. Advertising Agency Services were also treated as eligible in view of earlier Tribunal decisions recognising them as essential input services. Pandal or Shamiana Services were not accepted, as the explanation that they were used for staff events did not establish eligibility. Real Estate Agent and Consultant Service was also not accepted, as no satisfactory explanation of its use for the relevant rented premises was produced.

Conclusion: Refund denial was held unsustainable for all disputed input services except Real Estate Agent and Consultant Service, and the appeal succeeded to that extent only.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, refund of accumulated CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely for want of strict nexus where the input services are otherwise established as eligible, but specific services may still be excluded if their use is not satisfactorily shown.

---