Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to an amalgamated entity that had ceased to exist was valid, and whether the defect could be cured under Section 292B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The notice was issued in the name of an entity that had already merged and ceased to exist. The jurisdictional foundation for reassessment must be laid against the correct existing assessee, and a notice issued to a dead or non-existent entity is fundamentally infirm. Section 292B could not be invoked to regularise this defect because the error was not a mere clerical mistake in an otherwise valid proceeding.
Conclusion: The notice under Section 148 was invalid and was not saved by Section 292B; the challenge succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment notice was quashed and the petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A jurisdictional notice issued to an entity that has ceased to exist upon amalgamation is void, and such a foundational defect cannot be cured by Section 292B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.