Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was leviable where the assessee paid the short duty before issuance of the show cause notice and the adjudicating authority found no suppression of facts.
Analysis: Penalty under Section 11AC is attracted only when the statutory preconditions for its invocation are established. On the facts found, the assessee had reversed the CENVAT credit and paid the duty before the show cause notice was issued. The adjudicating authority also recorded a finding that there was no contravention, suppression of facts, or other circumstance attracting Section 11AC. In these circumstances, the mere existence of an earlier allegation in the notice did not justify penalty.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 11AC was not imposable, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the short duty is paid before issuance of the show cause notice and the findings do not establish suppression, fraud, or equivalent circumstances, penalty under Section 11AC cannot be imposed.